We’re happy to announce that our embedded database ObjectBox now officially runs on all major desktop platforms. This enables Java-based desktop apps on Windows, macOS, and Linux to utilize ObjectBox’ simplicity and performance.
From the beginning, ObjectBox has been created to run on multiple platforms. While our primary release target was Android, internally we ran ObjectBox mostly on desktop machines. This minimized turnaround and running times, and thus increased developer productivity greatly. Next step will be iOS… stay tuned.
If you are developing Android apps, you can use the desktop version of ObjectBox to run local unit tests. This has already been available for Linux and Windows machines for a while, and was recently complemented with the macOS release of ObjectBox.
Not running Java? We’re also working on a public C++ API: Talk to us if you are interested in a private beta.
We’re happy to announce 1.4 of our superfast mobile database that comes with three new features:
- Queries may now return values for an individual property (also supports distinct values)
- Entities may extend other entities
- 50% size reduction of native library
We just released ObjectBox 1.2 and recommend everybody to update. The new database version comes with many convenience improvements. Take life cycle interactions with queries for example:
ObjectBox 1.1 brings a data browser to view objects inside ObjectBox databases. This has become the most requested feature, so we are very happy about finally releasing it. The new data browser actually runs in the browser as it is an embedded web app. Thus, you can quickly check data on your device on the fly, or on your development machine to make use of your screen estate.
ObjectBox 1.0 is a SQLite database replacement. It makes object persistence on mobile (and IoT) devices simple and fast.
Code actually tells best what ObjectBox does (yes, it also does Kotlin):
Person person = new Person("John", "Doe")
long id = box.put(person); // Create
Person person = box.get(id); // Read
box.put(person); // Update
box.remove(person); // Delete
Don’t get us wrong: we think SQLite is a great piece of software and SQL is really powerful. We just do not love touching SQL so much when developing apps. That’s why we developed a very fast and easy alternative.
Being lazy or eager? Relations
ObjectBox comes with strong support for relations. How do you store a new object along with referenced objects? It’s simple:
Playlist playlist = new Playlist("My favs");
Thus, with a single
put(playlist), ObjectBox will not only persist the Playlist object but also the two associated Song objects. This also works with objects that were already persisted in the database.
A common challenge with relations is that they are typically loaded lazily. This can cause brief delays when accessing a relation for the first time, because the data must be pulled from the database at that moment. This in turn can cause the UI to slow down, e.g. when scrolling through the list (known as the “N+1 query problem”). Obviously, this may be harmful to the user experience and thus something you try to avoid. That is one of the reasons some ORMs do not support relations at all.
ObjectBox solves this challenge by enabling queries to preload relations in the background – aka “eager loading”. This makes processing the query result in the main thread super fast. Once the query is processed, eagerly loaded relations do not touch the database at all.
Eager loading is part of the Query API and not the entity itself. This gives you full flexibility over when to load what. For each query, you can specify which relations to preload like this:
We want to keep things simple. The objects returned from ObjectBox are POJOs (plain old Java objects). When you get an object, all properties are initialized and ObjectBox will never change the values. And, of course, you can pass those objects around in different threads.
Let’s also have quick look on entity classes. First, ObjectBox does not enforce a specific base class. You are free to extend from any class. Second, the classes also define the data model in the database (the “database schema”). Adding and removing entities/properties just work. Only renames require your interaction. The days of
CREATE TABLE scripts are finally gone, and typical data model updates do not require migration scripts.
We keep saying ObjectBox is fast. But how fast? And for what? We put together an open source benchmarking app, which come with a couple of performance tests for CRUD, queries, etc. Please check it out, have a look at the code, and make up your mind on the performance of ObjectBox. We really want to provide fair benchmarks.
A big thank you goes out to everyone who helped us in our beta phase (e.g. reported GitHub issues, blogs, …). It was only with your help that we reached version 1.0 now! As a special sign of appreciation, we’ll send out exclusive “early adopter” ObjectBox T-shirt: just write to us (contact@… – our domain) by September, 15th, with a link to your contribution along with your size and address.
We will add each and everyone that supports us and is part of the ObjectBox journey on our About us page! ObjectBox really is about you. So, let us know how you contributed (small things sometimes matter most…) and send us your picture and link (e.g. to your GitHub Account, Website or LinkedIn page).
Roadmap: bring your app to the edge
Our vision for ObjectBox is edge computing. It brings the data back to the user, to the device in his hand or home. We believe this is the future of computing. Small devices are tremendously powerful now, and it’s time to claim independence from the cloud while keeping in touch.
Before we go all edgy, we will address some essentials: Our plan for Version 1.1 is to rework the query API to and make expose object link API (aka “joins”). We also have to do our homework with some corner cases for data model changes. And of course, you may still find rough edges with the 1.0, which we’ll get rid off as soon as possible. We are dedicated to make ObjectBox a pure pleasure to work with.
We’re continually looking for feedback. Please do let us know what you think about ObjectBox: either by writing us at contact@… (our domain), or by answering these quick questions. Thank you!